The
Future
 

Home

Editor's Note

Introduction

Current Index

Free Your Mind

The Future

Wake Up

Editorials

Alliance

Bizarre

The Staff

Photos

Community

Blog

Funds for the Arts
By:
Kenneth Michael
Dinkajay802@aol.com

  

            Art programs in dance, music, visual arts, theater and a variety of others have proven beneficial to youth over the years. These programs have provided many outlets for unprivileged, unfocused and/or undetermined youth. With the implementation of President Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act, programs in the arts have been labeled as one of the 10 core subjects that schools nationwide must focus on. With core subjects being implemented in this new act by President Bush, one questions if funds and resources are properly being allocated for programs that center around the arts in nationwide schools.

…art programs focusing in dance and theater are becoming more foreign in numerous school systems. 

            *For 2008, the President is requesting $56.0 billion in discretionary appropriations for the Department of Education, the same as the 2007 level. With President Bush’s $56 billion proposal for education in 2008, there are a total of 44 other programs up for elimination and/or fund reduction in the coming year. Programs in art education appear on the list of funds being reduced, with a $35.3 million deduction. The elimination of these 44 programs (including art programs) leaves $2.2 billion available for distribution to programs in math, reading, and science which have shown success for future improvement. The elimination of these programs were based on PART (Program Assessment Rating Tool), which works along with the Department of Education to weed out the programs that bring in negative results and better fund the programs with more positive and/or adequate results. 

             Over the years, school districts have been responsible for making sure that money and funds are provided and programs are put into action for arts education. Although all states have art education policies, it was up to the districts to make the decision to provide funds until the NCLB Act of 2002. The NCLB Act made it mandatory that districts provide funding for the arts and arts education, becoming one of the 10 core academic subjects. **Despite there being 10 core subjects, NCLB currently requires schools to report student achievement test results for only reading and mathematics. Even with art education being a core subject on the NCLB Act, instruction time for art programs are limited in many nationwide schools. Along with instructional time of art programs in nationwide schools decreasing, art programs focusing in dance and theater are becoming more foreign in numerous school systems. Only art programs in music and visuals arts appear in many school systems, limiting the available variety in arts education.

Art programs in dance, music, visual arts, theater and a variety of others have proven beneficial to youth over the years.  

            When one brings into effect the $35.3 million reduction, limited instructional time and a limited variety of art programs, arts education in nationwide schools are not being funded properly. Furthermore, with more than a $30 million reduction in arts education, school systems that want to further provide education in the arts can look to the Improving Teacher Quality State Grant, as well as other programs. The JFK Center for the Performing Arts will also continue to provide funding for arts education but the federal government will provide less funding for the arts and more for math, science and reading programs in nationwide schools. 

Work Cited

*  http://www.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/budget08/summary/edlite-section1.html

**http://www.artsusa.org/services/arts_education/arts_education_015.asp